First, there was the lame attempt at guilt by association, with a mere campaign contribution by some red neck racist being touted as “proof” that Ron Paul is racist. And then there were equally stupid Kevin Baconesque degrees of separation attempts to connect Ron with various so-called “hate groups.”
by Stewart Rhodes
read more | digg story
The opponents of Ron Paul hate you, the freethinking person because you ARE FREE. They smear Ron Paul because they fear his message of hope and freedom.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Try reading the "Angry White Man" article in The New Republic.
No thanks Dana. I think I will get my information from sources other than Jamie Kirchick.
So, rather than confronting something specific you just pretend it doesn't exist at all - the whistling past the graveyard defense.
windsor:
this issue has already been been rehashed and confronted over and over and over again. maintaining Ron Paul is a racist is a proven smear and the people pushing this smear have a clear agenda. please come back when you actually have something to say other than the same old smears. is this really the best you can do?
i mean, the president of the Naacp came out a few days ago and said Ron Paul is his friend and not a racist, and this very article from a mexican american who has worked with paul says he isnt a racist, yet im supposed to believe the conclusions of a known zionist homosexual lobbyist who works for the New Republic, a neo-con rag? use your brain.
Keep whistling, homophobe...
homophobe? you are delusional. i think its nobodies business how two consenting adults live their lives. what i am opposed to is people using their sexuality, race or religion to impose their agenda on other people. i believe in freedom.
it looks like you believe in lies.
I read every word of the New Republic article, which apparently you did not. I found no content that even remotely suggested the author was "imposing" anything but previously documented information. You, on the other hand, chose to use religious and sexual labels as slurs rather than dealing with the actual content of the article. Bravo.
Once again, and this is the last time I will repeat myself.
Lets deal with the facts about this "article".
None of those newsletters were written by Dr. Paul. Fact.
All of the articles were disavowed by Dr. Paul. Fact.
The New Republic is a neo-con rag and Jamie Kirchick is a verified homosexual activist who has an agenda that makes him think it is okay to make up lies about Dr. Paul. Fact. Jamie Kirchick is a liar and has admitted as much. How can possibly defend his tactics and then have the hypocrisy to attack those of us who are telling the truth about Dr. Paul? For shame.
Dr. Paul is not a racist. Fact.
Go and peddle your hatred for the truth and for the message of freedom for ALL PEOPLE somewhere else.
Post a Comment